scroll to top
Stuck on your essay?
Get ideas from this essay and see how your work stacks up
Word Count: 317
Re Ingersoll -Rand Co v McClendon page 57Perry McClendon plaintiff was an employee of Ingersoll-Rand Co defendant for nine years Plaintiff felt he was fired short of his ten years of service so defendant could avoid pension obligations Plaintiff sued for wrongful discharge Defendant argues that plaintiffs common law claim was preempted by the ERISA Employee Retirement Income Security ActDefendant Terminated at will and common law case was preempted by ERISA provisionsAn ERISA plan exists and the employer had a pension-defeating motive in terminating the employment of plaintiffEIRSAs explicit language and its structure and purpose demonstrate a congressional intent to pre-empt a state common law claim that an employee was unlawfully discharged to prevent his attainment of benefits under an ERISA covered planGeneral Rule of Law The impact of this case of business today is noticeable in actions where you see companies offering early retirement packages to reduce workforce size and also avoid wrongful termination suits This case has held corporations more accoutable for terminating Case study states if plaintiff would have sued for pension benefits instead of wrongful termination the outcome would have been in his favorRule applied to facts The Texas court granted the company summary judgment and the State Court of Appeals affirmed ruling that plaintiffs employment was terminable at will The State Supreme Court reversed and remanded for trial holding that public policy required recognition of an exception to the employment-at-will doctrine Therefore recovery would be permitted in a wrongful discharge action if the plaintiff could prove that the principal reason for his termination was the employers desire to avoid contributing to or paying benefits under the employees pension fund In distinguishing federal cases holding similar claims pre-empted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 the court reasoned that plaintiff was seeking future lost wages recovery for mental anguish and punitive damages rather than lost pension benefits
@Kibin is a lifesaver for my essay right now!!
- Sandra Slivka, student @ UC Berkeley
Wow, this is the best essay help I've ever received!
- Camvu Pham, student @ U of M
If I'd known about @Kibin in college, I would have gotten much more sleep
- Jen Soust, alumni @ UCLA