scroll to top
Stuck on your essay?
Get ideas from this essay and see how your work stacks up
Word Count: 2,029
Since the dawn of man humans have striven to explain the many mysteries of the universe and to justify our existence in it Throughout this journey of self-understanding numerous standpoints on human existence have evolved and merged into a complex abstract manifestation called religion However as the human race has grown and advanced itself many ideas expressed by religion seem less and less plausible Advances in science and technology have yielded a new breed of human thought that has disturbed and shaken the foundations of religious ideology Our new scientifically grounded understanding of the universe has unfolded a plethora of answers to age-old questions which are antithetical to the explanations offered by religion As strong scientific evidence has surfaced which is contrary to the prevailing religious view open-minded believers have adapted their beliefs accordingly but many fundamentalists refuse to accept scientific evidence This is the root of the dilemma between science and religion Many philosophers and theists have offered their views concerning the ongoing battle between science and religion Reconciliation between science and religion is impossible because the claims made by religion and the evidence provided by science are so extraordinarily different The advance of science has caused many theists to compromise traditional religious beliefs in order to facilitate scientific evidence thus proving that scientific explanations of the universe are more plausible than the rationales offered by religion An excellent example of this can be seen in the question of the age of the planet Earth According to religious theology the Earth is less than ten thousand years old However there is an overwhelming amount of scientific evidence that proves the Earth to be many billions of years old Many religious thinkers have responded to this evidence by claiming that the methods used to ascertain the Earths age are inaccurate They argue that radioactive dating a widely accepted method of determining the age of rocks is inaccurate because there is no available rock sample
@Kibin is a lifesaver for my essay right now!!
- Sandra Slivka, student @ UC Berkeley
Wow, this is the best essay help I've ever received!
- Camvu Pham, student @ U of M
If I'd known about @Kibin in college, I would have gotten much more sleep
- Jen Soust, alumni @ UCLA