scroll to top
Stuck on your essay?
Get ideas from this essay and see how your work stacks up
Word Count: 760
Olmstead v United States 1928Opinion delivered by Chief Justice TaftVote 5-4Case reached Supreme Court by writ of certiorariFactsThe evidence in the records discloses a conspiracy of amazing magnitude to import possess and sell liquor unlawfully Involved were not less than fifty employees two sea-going vessels for transportation of the goods to British Columbia a ranch beyond the city limits of Seattle with a large underground cache to store the liquor and many other caches around the area of Seattle a maintained city office with executives secretaries salesmen deliverymen dispatchers bookkeepers collectors scouts and an attorney Olmstead was the leading conspirator and manager of the business His invested capital brought him 50 percent of the total income of the company said to be over 2 millionyear and the other 50 percent went to 11 other investors In the main office building there were three different telephones with separate lines for each Telephone communication was made throughout the city the homes of the investors customers Vancouver to and from the office building and ranch Times were fixed for the delivery of the stuff to places along the Puget Sound and from there was transported to the various cachesThe information leading to the arrests was made primarily by four Federal prohibition officers The officers placed small wires along the main lines outside the homes of the four main conspirators and that of the office No intrusion was made into private property Olmstead was found to have made dealings with members of the Seattle police to secure the release of any of the conspiring parties that might get arrested Procedural HistoryPetitioners were convicted in the District Court of the Western District of Washington for conspiracy to violate the National Prohibition Act The conviction was upheld upon appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals The case was granted writ of certiorari to the US Supreme Court Legal IssueWhether the use as evidence of private telephone conversations between the defendants
@Kibin is a lifesaver for my essay right now!!
- Sandra Slivka, student @ UC Berkeley
Wow, this is the best essay help I've ever received!
- Camvu Pham, student @ U of M
If I'd known about @Kibin in college, I would have gotten much more sleep
- Jen Soust, alumni @ UCLA