It looks like you've lost connection to our server. Please check your internet connection or reload this page.
1
30+
250
8000+
What Would Happen if Roe v. Wade Case Got Overturned
Final Essay In light of the recent election, many have begun to question what might happen if Roe v. Wade is to be overturned. The outcome would be a reversal of progress made allowing women’s rights to control issues of their reproductive rights and their bodies, and to create a biased and unsafe society for women seeki...
1,616 words
5 pages
A Case Study on R. v. OAKES S.C.R. 1-3
This final writing assignment asks us to focus on one or two cases we have read and talked about in class. I will be focusing on one case and then relating it to what we have learned in class from Aquinas’ human law theory, Hart’s view of law, liberty and morality, positivism, the realist theory, the separation of law and m...
2,032 words
6 pages
A Case Study on the Pregnancy Discrimination Case in the Ms. Hickie v Hunt & Hunt (1998)
Year 10 Commerce / Assessment Task 3 – Employment Relations Executive Summary This report provides an analysis and evaluation of the pregnancy discrimination case of Ms Hickie v Hunt & Hunt (1998). It will analyse how the case dealt with the failure of an employer to meet the needs and wants of a female employee tied to...
1,580 words
4 pages
The Cause of Procedural Irregularities and Its Link to Emotional Distress Among Jews After the Holocaust in the Eichmann trial
The focus of the investigation will be “How Was the Eichmann Trial Unconventional in its Handling of the Case and How Did This Affect the Outcome?” and will examine the causation of procedural irregularities and their link to the emotional distress of the Jewish people worldwide following the Holocaust. While the trial’s ov...
2,625 words
9 pages
An Analysis of the Issue of Damages in the Larry Landlord and Roger Renter Case
When a landlord and their potential tenants enter into a lease, both parties are held accountable for their own responsibilities (Samuelson & Beatty, 2007). These responsibilities are meant to make the roles of the renter and the landlord mutually beneficial to each other. In any rental lease, the key elements that typicall...
1,345 words
5 pages
An Analysis of Case 61 of Roman Law Through the Examples of Ulpian and Mela
Section #1 One of the most famous cases in Roman law is Case 61 in our casebook also known as “A barber cuts a slaves throat”. In this case, a barber was shaving a slaves face in an area where people were playing ball. One of the players hit the ball “quite hard” and the ball proceeded to hit the barber causing his hand to...
1,763 words
6 pages
An Analysis of the Concept of Suing Under Inuria in the Roman Legal System
Statue Inuria Under the Roman legal system, suing under Inuria was their way to provide compensation/punishment for damages to ones reputation. This statue covered an extensive scope ranging from physical assault of a person, to damages to their property. Suits filed under Inuria are interesting because one could not only...
974 words
3 pages
An Analysis of the Twelve Tables Code of Laws and Its Effects
Twelve Tables The Twelve Tables was meant to be a set of laws in which all Roman citizens, and those in Rome could follow. However, did this code of laws benefit everyone equally? The Twelve Tables was more beneficial to the Plebian class. The main reason why the Plebian class benefited more from the Twelve Tables was the...
638 words
2 pages
The Life and Legend of the Fourth Chief Justice of the United States, John Marshall
John Marshall: Life and Legacy Before John Marshall, the most basic responsibilities of the judicial system did not exist. In fact, justices could not even overturn blatantly unconstitutional laws. With Marshall, however, everything changed. Through his tenure as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall establishe...
1,681 words
6 pages
A Case Study of the Mathis v. United States Supreme Court Case
In the US Supreme Court Case, Mathis v. United States, there was an issue with a criminal act with a firearm that was committed. The case originated in a district court where it was ruled that a law was broken. This broken law was not just the crime itself, but apparently the gun involved was against the law as well. The...
995 words
3 pages
An Analysis of the Drinking and Driving Case of Ethan Couch Which Led to the Death of Four People
This paper explores the article on Ethan Couch, the Affluenza teen, who killed four people while drinking and driving. His sentencing was what caught national attention to many. The judge filed a ten year probation and time in a rehab facility after the psychologist hired stated that Ethan didn’t know right from wrong from...
1,173 words
2 pages
The Rule on Rylands v Fletcher Case and the Concept of Non-Natural Use
Rylands v Fletcher made a significant change to the law of nuisance. It involved a general rule of liability and it also allowed flexibility into the law as a result of the adoption of general terms like non-natural use. Different cases have shown that there is no exact definition to the term non-natural use and it all depe...
3,187 words
10 pages
A Comprehensive Analysis of the Case of McPhail Versus Doulton
There is an important distinction between trusts and powers, trusts are imperative to carry out and powers are discretionary. This distinction was not well maintained in the case of McPhail v Doulton. This Essay will discuss the different requirements in McPhail v Doulton, how the House of Lords tackled the wider area of ce...
2,564 words
7 pages
A Study on the Corruption Case of Joseph Bruno
Statement of Relevant Facts“Mr. Joseph Bruno was a Korean War veteran and a former boxer, whose jovial manner masked the iron hand he used to rule the Senate with almost untrammeled authority for nearly 14 years” (Confessore & Hakim). However, the former New York State Senate Leader was indicted in January 2009 by a grand j...
1,837 words
7 pages
An Examination of the Law on Homicide in the People v. Geiger Murder Case
An Analytical Examination on the Law of Homicide In the context of the law, murder is defined as the intentional or malicious killing of a human being. The defendants Geiger and Stamp did not intentionally kill anyone, yet they are being classified at the same level as Snowden, who was in fact a cold-blooded murderer. Th...
985 words
2 pages
Controversy Over the Effectiveness of Capital Punishment vs. Lifelong Incarceration: Views Presented in Texts by Jack Weil, Ray Krone and Anne Rossi
There is much controversy over the effectiveness of capital punishment versus lifelong incarceration. There are two sides to this argument: either capital punishment should be abolished or capital punishment should be kept for proper retribution of criminals. The death penalty should be abolished because it is not humane to...
1,055 words
4 pages
The History and Effects of the Articles of Confederation
The treaty of Paris in 1783 ended the revolutionary war between
Britain and its former colonies, America. After a long and gruesome war
with many lives lost, the former colonists finally won their independence
at the Battle of Yorktown. The defeat of the British at the battle of
Yorktown would not have b...
1,193 words
4 pages
The Impact of the Freedom of Information Act of 1966
The Freedom of Information Act of 1966 addresses the right of the public to obtain information from federal government agencies (with some exemptions). What became FOIA was originally introduced as an amendment the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) of 1946. Section 3 of the APA had every federal agency make available to t...
1,492 words
6 pages
The Wrongful Conviction of Henry Houghton to Having Kidnapped and Raped Tanya Savage, a Twelve Year Old GIrl
The Wrongful Conviction of Henry Houghton On July 19th, 1989, Tanya Savage, a twelve year old girl, claimed that she was kidnapped and raped by a friend of hers, named Henry Houghton. Here are both of their accounts, and a list of all the inconsistencies within the statements. Tanya told the police that on Sunday, July...
2,124 words
9 pages
The Effectiveness and Efficiency of the Laws in Rome
Criminal justice came hand in hand with humanity. One of the things that distinguishes humans from any other species is the ability to identify and cope with injustice in a reasonable manner. Criminal justice is “the system of law enforcement that is directly involved in apprehending, prosecuting, defending, sentencing, and...
1,032 words
4 pages
An Analysis of the Court's Decision on the Case of Mr. McCord
Describe in your own words the facts and circumstances of the case.Mr. and Mrs. McCord filed for divorce in 1988 and because Mrs. McCord got full custody Mr. McCord had to pay $300 a month in child support. Many years later in 1994 Mr. McCord won the Colorado lottery and his winnings consisted of $2 million, after he quit h...
683 words
2 pages
The Issue of Trying and Sentencing Minors on the Example of Marin Sinzer's Case
Abstract For about 100 years our society has thought about whether or not it is moral or legal to try a minor or juvenile as an adult in our legal system. No one in our society has thought about whether or not we could or should try an adult in a juvenile court because it is very rare. The idea that a minor was so young...
1,284 words
4 pages
The Effects of the Jim Crow Laws on the Lives of Americans From the North and the South
During the time Jim Crow laws were in place, the daily lives of everyone living in the deep South were affected, whether they recognized it or not. For some, Jim Crow was part of their culture and so they did not even acknowledge its power, they just saw it as a way of life. Although some people living in the North had no i...
991 words
3 pages
The Supreme Court Should Carefully Review Barrack Obama's Proposal on Immigrants
Last Tuesday, the Obama administration said that it will ask the Supreme Court to reverse a lower court decision in an effort to back the ideas of the White House to shield over four million immigrants from their deportation. However, in a similar decision on Monday, the court ruled that Obama had exceeded his authority, e...
333 words
1 page
An Examination of the Hammurabi and Its Effects on the Lives of the Babylonians
An Evaluation of the Hammurabi Code & Its Impact on Old Babylon The Hammurabi Code, at its most basic level, is a code of law designed to govern the people of its time. Believed to have been written over 3000 years ago in the height of the Babylonian empire, the code comprises of 282 laws that governed the common people of...
1,329 words
5 pages